båt, skrov, ponton, bom

Kanot, bestående av en urholkad trädstam med vidfästad utriggare. Saknar nummer och är ej omnämnd i originalkatalogen. Den är dock omnämnd på sid.486 och 487 i Mjöbergs bok från år 1918, och är i samma verk även avbildad på bild 218 (sid. 484). Cairns Queensland Australien (generalkatalogen)
längd 4,64 m
pontonens längd 4,20 m
pontonens bredd 0,085 m
huvudskrovets tungor 40 cm resp. 53 cm långa
huvudskrovets bredd 33 cm
huvudskrovets djup 32 cm
Huvudskrovet av en urholkad stock med rundat avskurna stävar och utskjutande "tungor".
Krokigt skrov. Smal springa, 8-10 i skrovet.
4 bommar vardera bestående av 2 käppar som går tvärs igenom huvudskrovets båda sidor. bommarnas längd 1,45 m
Fästade till pontonen medelst 2 käppar, korslagda, bommarna surrade till käpparna, vilka är intappade i pontonen.
Längd mellan bommarna 1,40 m, 1,25 m resp. 0,90 m
Pontonens ena ände avsmalnande och en aning uppdragen — den andra tvärt avskuren, kraftigare.
Samma litteratur som för flotten från Australien
+ Hornell II, s. 189

The craft could accommodate five or six people according to a report from anthropologist Walter Roth. He noted that they sat on the double beams passing through both gunwales, with their legs crossed over due to the narrow gap cut in the log. They were used along the shore and amongst the islands just offshore of this coastline. It is not recorded if they went further out to sea. The type is believed to be the most southern outrigger and dugout type used by Indigenous communities on the eastern coastline. The concept of the structure can be compared to the more sophisticated and detailed outriggers of Torres Strait, which would have been an influence on the development of the various mainland types of outrigger.
This example was donated to the museum in 1915 by Dr Ronald Hamlyn-Harris. In 2010 it is on loan from the Queensland Museum and is on display at the Menmuny Museum at Yarrabah. (Australian Register of Historic Vessels, ARHV, www.anmm.gov.au/arhv)

Text from Australian Register of Historic Vessels, ARHV, www.anmm.gov.au/arhv:
The Gunggandji Indigenous outrigger canoe (Quensland museum, a canoe that is a similar canoe to 1920.14.0120) is a single outrigger vessel from the eastern side of Cape York Peninsula in northern Australia. It is one of very few examples of the 'square cut' outrigger that exist in other Australian collections, and the name is a reference to how the ends of the main hull are shaped. This is a single outrigger type which was first described in detail in the 1770 journals of Cook's Endeavour expedition during the period they were repairing Endeavour after their grounding on the Great Barrier Reef.
The Gunggandji Indigenous outrigger canoe type was also documented by anthropologist Walter Roth when he was in the area in the late 1890s. His paper was published in 1910: North Queensland Ethnography Bulletin No 14, Transport and Trade. Roth observed various outriggers down the east and west coasts of Cape York, and recorded sketches and descriptions. There were distinct changes as he moved south, and this example is a type he observed from Mossman River down to Cape Grafton or Yarrabah. The main hull is a dugout with the hollowed out inside shaped from a single log. The more or less circular cross section has a narrow opening at the top and expert craftsmanship would have been needed to work in the concave areas at the sides of the interior. On the outside, the ends have a unique form. Both ends are cut square to the axis, and have a flap type extension of the bark and trunk remaining at the top, protruding around 400 mm or so beyond the cut. This extension is seen on other types further north but is usually restricted to the bow. Roth recorded that it was used as a platform for a hunter, from which he could spear turtle or dugong. Any other use or perhaps what they could symbolize is not recorded, however it is conceivable that they would also act as a spray deflector when heading into choppy seas, keeping water out of the hull.
The outrigger hull is a much smaller diameter solid log, shaped a little at the ends. Roth's notes indicate that the float or outrigger is called 'bunul' by the Gunggandji people of Yarrabah. Bunul is the term used for the mullet fish and would reflect the outrigger's ability to easily glide tor skim across the watersurface. It is connected to the main hull with four sets of double beams and twin sticks forming an 'X' shaped cross. The sets of beams are lashed through holes to the main hull on both sides or gunwale edges of the opening in the main hull, and the branches on each pair are about 100 mm apart. The outer ends of the beams are then tied to the centre of the X, one above and one below the crossing of the sticks. The sticks are driven into holes in the outrigger. The double arrangement of beams, their spacing and securing at either end provides a degree of cross bracing and stiffness to the complete structure, which is basically a simple and effective cantilever operating in two planes; fore and aft, and vertically.

Canoe, a single outrigger from the Cape Grafton region in Queensland. Cairns is just to the west of Cape Grafton or Yarrabah in the local Aboriginal language, and from our information so far, is the furthest south these craft were built. Their extent went as far north as about Cape Melville, at which point the design changes a little and has a more streamlined shaped bow and stern, but otherwise is reasonably similar. I know they type is built by the Guugu-Yimidhirr who are in the centre of this distribution , as their community in Cooktown has built two in the last five years or so.
I have recorded an example that belongs to the Queensland Museum- it is on display near Cairns. It is referred to as the Gunggandji Indigenous Outrigger Canoe on the Australian Register of Historic Vessels (ARHV) and the website www.anmm.gov.au/arhv. Gunggandji may be a variant or even more recent spelling and name for the community around Cairns, my records show the name as Djabugnajdji but this was from a 1980s survey of communities.
The images you have sent suggest the main hull has twisted over time, but otherwise it is essentially intact. It is quite remarkable to have been collected and taken back to Sweden, and gives us an excellent record of an early example to compare with what other information we have. (email from David Payne, Australian National Maritime Museum, 2015-02-09)